Enterprise SEO Consulting

Senior SEO counsel for large organisations where organic search is a revenue channel, not a checkbox.

Enterprise SEO is a different discipline from the agency retainers and checklists most teams are used to. When a site has tens of thousands of pages, a decade of legacy technology, a CMS that only lets you change half the things you need to, and six stakeholders who each own a piece of the problem, the work is mostly judgement, prioritisation and persistence — not tricks. That's the work I do.

What enterprise SEO actually involves

At scale, SEO is a programme, not a project. Decisions that take a small site an afternoon — a URL change, a template edit, a redirect — can take an enterprise a quarter, because they touch release cycles, legal review, brand guidelines and half a dozen teams. Good enterprise SEO accounts for that reality:

  • Prioritisation by commercial impact, not by what's easiest to implement
  • Templates and governance that let change happen once and propagate everywhere
  • Working within CMS and platform constraints instead of pretending they don't exist
  • Clear ownership, so work doesn't die between teams
[S1]Scope

The six disciplines inside enterprise SEO

  • Crawl economics

    Crawl budget, log-file analysis and indexation control for sites where a wasted crawl has a real cost.

  • Site architecture

    Faceted navigation, internal linking and hierarchy design that scale to hundreds of thousands of URLs without sprawl.

  • Platform and templates

    CMS and template-level changes that fix whole classes of pages at once — the highest-leverage work on any large site.

  • Structured data at scale

    Markup strategy across templates, validation at deploy time, and schema as a feed into answer engines.

  • Governance

    Release checklists, SEO sign-off workflows and guardrails so twelve teams cannot break the site in twelve different ways.

  • Measurement

    SoV, log-based reporting and revenue attribution that survive legal, procurement and analytics-team scrutiny.

Why rankings reports mislead

A ranking for one keyword tells you almost nothing about how a large business performs in search. Rankings fluctuate, personalise, and ignore the thousands of queries your customers actually use. Share of voice — your visibility across the full set of commercially relevant searches, measured against competitors — is a far more honest measure. It moves when real work lands, it shows where competitors are gaining ground, and it's a number a board can understand.

[S2]Measurement

Rankings vs share of voice

The reporting change that matters most at enterprise scale — because rankings quietly misrepresent position in the category.

Rankings vs share of voiceRankings reportShare of voice
What it countsPosition on a hand-picked keyword listPresence across the full category demand curve
Blind spotLong tail, local variance, personalisationNone — it is a census, not a sample
Competitor viewOnly where you chose to lookWho takes the demand you are losing, per cluster
Board translation“We rank 4th for our own name”“We own 23% of category search demand”
Decision valueLow — reactive, after the factHigh — predicts revenue and directs spend

Governance and strategy

Most enterprise SEO problems are organisational, not technical. I help teams establish decision rights, intake processes, content standards and technical guardrails so that SEO survives staff changes and agency rotations. The goal is a capability that keeps working after the consultant leaves.

[S3]Cadence

How the governance cadence works

Enterprise consulting is mostly a rhythm: fixed forums where search is decided, not discovered by accident.

  1. Monthly prioritisation forum

    Monthly

    One hour. The only meeting where SEO priorities are set.

    Product, engineering, content and agency attend. Everything competes on the same page: effort, payback, and what gets deferred.

  2. Release sign-off

    Per release

    SEO gate on template and platform changes before they ship.

    A checklist and a human. Prevents the classic pattern where a “small” release noindexes forty thousand pages.

  3. Quarterly strategy review

    Quarterly

    SoV movement, roadmap progress and the next quarter’s bets.

    Attended by the leadership layer. Decisions and budget changes are made here, in the room, with the data in front of everyone.

What a consulting engagement looks like

Engagements typically start with a diagnostic: technical crawl, share of voice baseline, stakeholder interviews. From there we agree a roadmap tied to business outcomes, and I work alongside your in-house team and agencies through delivery — senior counsel, honest pushback, and no theatre. Some clients need a few months to get a programme unstuck; others keep a retained advisory arrangement. Both are fine. What's not on offer is a guaranteed rankings promise — anyone selling that is guessing.

[S4]Deliverables

What the engagement produces

  • Quarterly SoV report with competitor movement per cluster
  • Prioritised technical roadmap, engineering-ready with acceptance criteria
  • Governance pack: release checklists, sign-off workflow, RACI
  • Template-level specs that fix page classes at the source
  • Board and leadership reporting, written for a non-SEO audience
  • Decision log covering every significant call and its rationale
[Q]Questions

Enterprise SEO Consulting: common questions

  • Through tickets and specs, not decks. Every recommendation ships as an engineering-ready ticket with acceptance criteria, and I sit in the relevant sprint ceremonies until the pattern is established. Most teams need two or three cycles before the working relationship runs without me.

  • The frameworks in use here come from three proprietary tools and an audit methodology built while running enterprise accounts at Omnicom agencies — thirty-plus engagements across banking, retail, travel and B2B. Sites from fifty thousand to several million URLs.

  • Yes. Enterprise engagements often sit alongside a retained agency. The division that works: the agency owns delivery capacity, I own prioritisation and quality control, and your team owns the roadmap.

Tell Me What You Need to Win.

I will tell you honestly whether I am the right person for it.